Reader-First Editing:

DatingSitesUK is written for readers who need practical help choosing a dating site. We aim to make reviews clear, specific and useful rather than promotional. A page should help someone understand whether a service fits their goal, budget and safety expectations.

Independence and Commercial Relationships:

Some pages may include affiliate links, and some providers may be commercial partners. Those relationships do not decide every recommendation, remove criticism or prevent us from discussing costs, free limitations, safety concerns or cancellation issues.

When we recommend a site, the recommendation should be explainable in reader terms: audience fit, feature usefulness, price clarity, trust signals or a genuine niche match.

Sourcing Standards:

We prefer direct provider information, public help pages, pricing pages, app store listings, provider safety guidance and other reputable sources. We try to distinguish confirmed facts from editorial judgement. If a claim cannot be verified confidently, we avoid overstating it.

• Prices are treated as changeable unless the provider clearly states otherwise.
• User counts and traffic estimates are handled carefully and only when useful.
• UK-specific information is preferred when a provider has a UK-facing site.

Tone and Fairness:

We avoid shaming readers for their dating goals. At the same time, we do not ignore risk. Sensitive dating categories deserve plain language about privacy, age rules, paid messaging, safety tools and expectations. Our job is to help readers make informed decisions, not to pressure them into joining a service.

Corrections and Updates:

If we publish something inaccurate or outdated, we aim to correct it when reliable information is provided. Readers and providers can send correction requests with a page URL, the exact claim in question and a source showing the updated information.